Skip to navigation

An enquiry into the acceptance of accessible web content and web design standards by UK small businesses.

7.0 References

BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION (2006) PAS 78:2006. Guide to good practice in commissioning accessible websites. London : BSI.

BUDD, A. (2004) ‘The Business Case for Web Accessibility’ Andy Budd, Blogography. 19 January. http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2004/01/the_business_case_for_web_accessibility/ [2 April 2006]

BURTON , M. in a webcast recorded by The DRC, 14 April 2004, London . Cited in: Davies, M. (2004) ‘The DRC Report into UK web accessibility’ Isolani. 14 April. http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/access/DrcReportOnUkWebAccessibility [12 April 2006]

CLARK, J. (1995) ‘Worth a thousand words?’ Toronto Globe & Mail n.d. http://joeclark.org/access/webaccess/textonly.html [8 April 2006]

CLARK, J. (2000) ‘Flash Access: Unclear on the Concept’ A List Apart. 1 December. http://www.alistapart.com/articles/unclear/ [8 April 2006]

CLARK, J. (2002) Building Accessible Websites, 1st ed. New Riders.

CLARK, J. (2003) ‘How Hard is it to watch description in UK ?’ axxLOG 12 September. http://joeclark.org/axxlog/2003/2003b.html#DX-UK [8 April 2006]

CLARKE, A. (2005a) ‘Accessibility and a society of control’ And All That Malarkey. 16 June. http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/accessibility_and_a_society_of_control.html [9 April 2006]

CLARKE, A. (2005b) ‘The role of government in web accessibility’ And All That Malarkey. June 18. http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/the_role_of_government_in_web_accessibility.html [9 April 2006]

COX REVIEW (2005) Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UK ’s strengths. London : TSO.

DECLOAK (n.d.) ‘CSS vs. Tables’. DeCloak.com. n.d. http://www.decloak.com/Dev/CSSTables/CSS_Tables_05.aspx [xxx]

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995. London : TSO.

DRC (2002) ‘Code of Practice: Rights of Access; Goods, Facilities, Services and Premises’ Disability Rights Commission. http://www.drc-gb.org/open4all/law/Code%20of%20Practice.pdf [2 April 2006]

DRC (2004a) The Web, Access and Inclusion for Disabled People, A formal investigation conducted by the Disability Rights Commission, 2004. TSO.

DRC (2004b) [Communication] ‘DRC Toolkit’ Disability Rights Commission. n.d. http://www.disabilityaware.org/docs/communication_01.html [14 April 2006]

EGOV MONITOR NEWSDESK (2005) ‘EU websites fail accessibility tests’ eGov Monitor. 25 November 2005 http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/3738 [15 April 2006]

EU (2003) ‘SME Definition’ EUROPA Enterprise and Industry. 6 May. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enterprise_policy/sme_definition/index_en.htm [14 April 2006]

GLASSHAUS (n.d.) ‘Interview with Molly E. Holzschlag [& Bruce Lawson]’ Glasshaus. http://www.glasshaus.com/Author.asp?AuthorID=39 [12 April 2006]

GOOGLE (2005) ‘Webmaster Guidelines’ Google Information for Webmasters. n.d. http://www.google.co.uk/webmasters/guidelines.html [14 April 2006]

HEILMANN, C. (2005) ‘10 Reasons Clients Don't Care About Accessibility’ Digital Web Magazine. 12 September. http://www.digital-web.com/articles/ten_reasons_clients_dont_care_about_accessibility/ [3 April 2006]

HOLZSCHLAG , M.E. (2005) ‘Web Standards and The New Professionalism’ Molly. 14 November. http://www.molly.com/2005/11/14/web-standards-and-the-new-professionalism/ [12 April 2006]

JOHANSSON, R. (2005) ‘A web professional can never stop learning’ 456 Berea St. 15 November. http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200511/a_web_professional_can_never_stop_learning/ [12 April 2006]

JOHANSSON, R. (2006) ‘iWeb, the new tag soup generator’ 456 Berea St. 13 March. http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/iweb_the_new_tag_soup_generator/ [14 April 2006]

KOLTZ, H.M. (2005) ‘Beyond New Professionalism’ The Web Standards Project. 16 November. http://www.webstandards.org/2005/11/16/beyond-new-professionalism/ [12 April 2006]

LAWSON, B. (2004) ‘CSS/xhtml: does validation matter?’ BruceLawson.co.uk. 21 November. http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2004/css-xhtml-does-validation-matter/ [9 April 2006]

LAWSON, B. (2005) ‘The two great accessibility debates’ BruceLawson.co.uk. 29 June. http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/the-two-great-accessibility-debates/ [9 April 2006]

LAWSON, B <bruce@REMOVED> (2006) ‘RE: Have I mangled your words sufficiently?’ 20 April. Email to Andrew Higgs < cdah@REMOVED>

LLOYD, I. (2005) ‘Interview with Andy Clarke (AKA Accessibility, the gloves come off)’ Accessify.com. 14 November. http://accessify.com/2005/11/interview-with-andy-clarke-aka.php [12 April 2006]

MOSS, T. (2004a) ‘How To Sell Accessibility’ Sitepoint. 6 April. http://www.sitepoint.com/article/sell-web-accessibility [2 April 2006]

MOSS, T. (2004b) ‘Web Accessibility and UK Law: Telling It Like It Is.’ A List Apart. 9 April http://www.alistapart.com/articles/accessuk/ [2 April 2006]

NEAL, D. (2003) ‘Blind sue over site failings’ VNUnet.com. 10 July http://www.vnunet.com/itweek/news/2085084/blind-sue-site-failings-2 [8 April 2006]

NEWSON, A. (2006) ‘Website Accessibility – the legal issues and PAS 78’ Guild of Accessible Web Designers. 10 March. http://www.gawds.org/show.php?contentid=159 [8 April 2006]

NIELSEN, J. (2005a) ‘Alertbox: Ten Years’ UseIt.com. 1 June. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050601.html [13 April 2006]

NIELSEN, J. (2005b) ‘Accessibility Is Not Enough’ UseIt.com. 21 June. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/accessibility.html [13 April 2006]

NIELSEN NET RATINGS (2006) ‘Who Benefits Most From Search?’ Nielsen Media Research. 3 April. http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/PR_033006_UK.pdf [17 April 2006]

OFFICE OF NATIONAL STATISTICS (2001) London : TSO. Cited in: Clark, J. (2005) ‘Accessibility: Simple Facts About a Tricky Subject’ Notes from presentation at @Media 9 July 2005. 9 July. http://joeclark.org/atmedia/atmedia-NOTES-1.html [9 April 2006]

OXTON, J. (2006) ‘Having read PAS 78’ JohnOxton.co.uk. 12 March. http://johnoxton.co.uk/article/28/having-read-pas-78 [14 March 2006]

POWELL, B.A. (2006) ‘Transfer student has Target-ed independence for blind people as a major goal’ Berkeley , University of California News . 20 March. http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2006/03/20_sexton.shtml [18 April 2006]

ROBERTSON, S. (2006) ‘How to commission an accessible website’ Out-Law News. 9 March. http://www.out-law.com/page-6713 [14 April 2006]

RNID (2005) ‘Deadline for free training – 16 May 2005’ RNID Media Centre. n.d. http://www.rnid.org.uk/mediacentre/press/2005/ddat.htm [6 April 2006]

SCHOFIELD, J. (2005) ‘Lazy, stupid and evil design’ Guardian Unlimited. 23 June. http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1511967,00.html [8 April 2006]

SLATIN, J.M. & RUSH S. (2002) Maximum Accessibility: Making Your Web Site More Usable for Everyone, 1st ed. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Stuart, N., Watson, A. & Williams, J. (2002) How Employers and Service Providers are responding to The Disability Discrimination Act 1995. London : Department for Work and Pensions. Cited in: Howard, M. (2004). Small Employer Literature Review. Disability Rights Commission. [Internal Report].

WARD, M. (2004) ‘A decade of good website design’ BBC News. 7 December. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4061093.stm [12 April 2006]

WaSP (n.d.) ‘WaSP Fighting For Standards [ Mission ]’ Web Standards Project n.d. http://www.webstandards.org/about/mission/ [8 April 2006]

WEB ACCESSIBILITY INITIATIVE (2005) ‘Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization: Overview’. World Wide Web Consortium. August. http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/Overview/ [4 April 2006]

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM (1996) W3C Recommendation: Cascading Style Sheets, level 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1 [3 April 2006]

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM (1998) W3C Recommendation: Cascading Style Sheets, level 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2 [3 April 2006]

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM (1999a) W3C Recommendation: HTML 4.01 Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/ [3 April 2006]

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM (1999b) W3C Recommendation: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/ [3 April 2006]

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM (2000) W3C Recommendation: XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition). http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ [3 April 2006]

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM (2001) W3C Recommendation: XHTML™ 1.1 - Module-based XHTML. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/ [3 April 2006]

ZELDMAN, J. (2001) ‘To Hell With Bad Browsers.’ A List Apart. 16 February http://www.alistapart.com/articles/tohell/ [12 April 2006]

7.1 Bibliography

This bibliography contains sources that are not necessarily referenced, but provided insight and background to the discussions.

ACCESSIFY (2006) Accessify.com. http://www.accessify.com [12 April 2006]

A LIST APART (2006) A List Apart. http://www.alistapart.com [12 April 2006]

BRAUN, K. et al (2002) Usability: The Site Speaks For Itself, 1st ed. Glasshaus.

BUDD, A. (2006) Andy Budd, Blogography. http:// www.andybudd.com [2 April 2006]

CLARK , J. (2006) Joe Clark, Accessibility, Design, Writing. http://www.joeclark.org [8 April 2006]

CLARKE, A. (2006) And All That Malarkey. http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk [9 April 2006]

COTTRELL, S. (2003) The Study Skills Handbook, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke .

DOFORUM (2006) [Forum] Designate Online. http://www.designateonline.com/forum/ [4 April 2006]

HOLZSCHLAG , M.E. (2006) Molly. http://www.molly.com [12 April 2006]

JOHANSSON, R. (2006) 456 Berea St. http://www.456bereastreet.com [12 April 2006]

LAWSON, B. (2006) BruceLawson.co.uk. http://www.brucelawson.co.uk [14 April 2006]

OXTON, J. (2006) Joshaink. http://www.joshuaink.com [2 April 2006]

OXTON, J. (2006) JohnOxton.co.uk. http://www.johnoxton.co.uk [2 April 2006]

RNIB (2006) Royal National Institute for the Blind. http://www.rnib.org [4 April 2006]

RNID (2006) Royal National Institute for the Deaf. http://www.rnid.org [4 April 2006]

RUDD, D. (2005) Cite Me, I’m Yours – Harvard Version; References, Bibliographies, Notes, Quotations, Etc. University of Bolton.

WaSP (2006)Web Standards Project. http://www.webstandardsproject.org [2 April 2006]

Back to top | Previous | Next